Jones v. Unguriet

71 A.2d 240, 364 Pa. 200
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 7, 1950·No. Appeal, 43·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff sued as administratrix of her deceased husband’s estate for damages for his wrongful death due, as the complaint avers, to negligence of the defendant. The latter filed preliminary objections questioning the court’s jurisdiction of the action. The factual grounds for the attack, as shown by the petition accompanying the objections, were that the plaintiff’s decedent was an employee of the defendant and that he was acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident which caused his death. The defendant accordingly contended that his liabilty in the premises was for the payment of workmen’s compensation and that, by like token, the court was without jurisdiction of the trespass action pleaded by the plaintiff. The learned court below overruled the objections with leave to the defendant to answer over; but, the defendant appealed. Be that as it may, the decision is not presently reviewable; the appeal was taken out of time and must, therefore, be quashed.

When Rule 1017 (b) (1) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure (354 Pa. xxxvi) made preliminary objections an available pleading for the purpose of raising a jurisdictional question, Sections 1 and 2 of the Act of March 5,1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq., which had theretofore provided the appropriate procedure, were at the same time suspended except insofar as they confer the right to appeal from a decision on a jurisdictional question: see Rule 1451 (b) (7), 354 Pa. lxxxiv. Such right is conferred by Section 1 of the Act of 1925 which, by its terms, makes the right to appeal the same as in cases of final judgments, while Section 3, which was un *202 affected by the Rules of Civil Procedure and remains in full force, provides that the appeal allowed by Section 1, “. . . must be taken and perfected within fifteen days from the date when the decision [on a jurisdictional question] is rendered. ...” Nor is there any way by which the statutorily prescribed period for appeal may be judicially extended or obviated. In the present instance, the record shows that the appeal was taken and perfected more than fifteen days after the decision appealed from had been rendered. The appeal is therefore quashed.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Unguriet, 71 A.2d 240, 364 Pa. 200 (Pa. 1950).

71 A.2d 240 (Jones v. Unguriet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of A.P.
617 A.2d 764 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Reading Anthracite Co. v. Rich
577 A.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. Board of Property Assessment Appeals & Review
439 A.2d 1259 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Erie Redevelopment Authority v. Pulakos
267 A.2d 873 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
215 A.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Luzerne County
134 A.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Miller v. Lembo
10 Pa. D. & C.2d 145 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
Busillo v. Silvers
10 Pa. D. & C.2d 344 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
Miles v. Masters
97 A.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)