Jones v. Ukrop's Supermarkets, Inc.

155 F. App'x 639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 2005
DocketNo. 05-1372
StatusPublished

This text of 155 F. App'x 639 (Jones v. Ukrop's Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Ukrop's Supermarkets, Inc., 155 F. App'x 639 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Beth F. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Ukrop’s Supermarkets, Inc., No. CA-04-833-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 F. App'x 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ukrops-supermarkets-inc-ca4-2005.