Jones v. U-Drive-It Company
154 A. 326, 107 N.J.L. 523, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 209
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. U-Drive-It Company, 154 A. 326, 107 N.J.L. 523, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1931).
154 A. 326 (Jones v. U-Drive-It Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
174 N.W.2d 672 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Lowe Construction Co.
99 N.W.2d 421 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1959)
Czajowski v. Arlington Realty Co.
50 A.2d 151 (U.S. District Court, 1946)
Frank Martz Coach Co. v. Hudson Bus Transportation Co.
44 A.2d 488 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1945)
Popkin Bros. v. Volk's Tire Co.
23 A.2d 162 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)
Sakos v. Byers
169 A. 705 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)
Quatray v. Wicker
151 So. 208 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)