Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
126 F. App'x 106
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 14, 2005·No. 04-2156·Unpublished·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Sherika L. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc., No. CA-04-276-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 126 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2005).
126 F. App'x 106 (Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christina Egan v. Ballantyne Country Club
W.D. North Carolina, 2026
WATSON v. MCPHATTER
M.D. North Carolina, 2025
Arnold v. United Parcel Service Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
E.D. Virginia, 2024
Doe v. Rockingham County School Board
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Nixon v. Kysela Pere Et Fils, LTD.
W.D. Virginia, 2021
Doe v. Coastal Carolina University
D. South Carolina, 2021
Eline v. Town of Ocean City Maryland
D. Maryland, 2020
POUNCEY v. GUILFORD COUNTY
M.D. North Carolina, 2020
Clehm v. Bae Sys. Ordnance Sys., Inc.
291 F. Supp. 3d 775 (W.D. Virginia, 2017)