Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

126 F. App'x 106

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 2005

Docket04-2156

StatusUnpublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 126 F. App'x 106 (Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 126 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherika L. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc., No. CA-04-276-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sherika L. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc., No. CA-04-276-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 F. App'x 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-tyson-foods-inc-ca4-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack