Jones v. Trulock

158 S.E. 326, 172 Ga. 558, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1931·No. No. 8184·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The contract signed by Lewis (reciting that it was made as a part of the agreement in the sale of the land) conveys an interest or estate in the land and waters, the right to hunt on the lands and to take fish in the waters on the land. This contract binds Trulock, a subsequent grantee of Lewis. Bosworth v. Nelson, 170 Ga. 279 (152 S. E. 575).

2. The court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. TF. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Trulock, 158 S.E. 326, 172 Ga. 558, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 149 (Ga. 1931).

158 S.E. 326 (Jones v. Trulock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barton v. Gammell
238 S.E.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Brown v. Mathis
41 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
United States v. 1,070 Acres of Land
52 F. Supp. 378 (M.D. Georgia, 1943)