Jones v. Travis
This text of Jones v. Travis (Jones v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8288
RICCARDO DARNELL JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. TRAVIS, Correctional Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00112-GCM)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Riccardo Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Riccardo Darnell Jones appeals the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jones v. Travis, No. 5:08-cv-00112-GCM (W.D.N.C.
Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Travis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-travis-ca4-2009.