Jones v. Tisdell

239 A.D.2d 966, 662 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6477
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to consolidate and dismiss appeals for failure timely to perfect denied and cross motions for extension of time to perfect denied. Memorandum: None of the appellants was assigned counsel by this Court. Both appeals therefore were required to be perfected within nine months of the date on the notices of appeal and were deemed abandoned and dismissed on December 22, 1996 (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.12 [b] [former 1000.3 (b) (2)]). We decline to exercise our discretion to convert the cross motions for extensions of time to perfect the appeals to motions to vacate the automatic dismissals because the order sought to be appealed is an intermediate order that is not appealable as of right (see, Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]), and leave to appeal is not warranted. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Tisdell, 239 A.D.2d 966, 662 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 966 (Jones v. Tisdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Steeno v. Szydlowski
2020 NY Slip Op 1808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)