Jones v. TireHub, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 18, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00564·Unknown

Opinion

1 Scott Edward Cole, Esq. (S.B. #160744) Laura Van Note, Esq. (S.B. #310160) 2 Cody Alexander Bolce, Esq. (S.B. #322725) COLE & VAN NOTE 3 555 12th Street, Suite 1725 Oakland, California 94607 4 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Facsimile: (510) 891-7030 5 Email: sec@colevannote.com Email: lvn@colevannote.com 6 Email: cab@colevannote.com Web: www.colevannote.com 7

8 Attorneys for Representative Plaintiff

9 Penny Chen, Esq. (S.B. #280706) 10 Eugene C. Ryu, Esq. (S.B. #209104) K&L GATES 11 10100 Santa Monica Blvd, 8th Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90067 12 Telephone: (310) 552-5033 Email: Penny.Chen@klgates.com 13 Email: Gene.Ryu@klgates.com

15 Attorneys for Defendant TIREHUB, LLC 16

17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20 DONSHEA JONES, individually , and on No. 2:21-cv-0564 JAM DB behalf of all others similarly situated, 21 CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, 22 vs. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING 23 TIREHUB, LLC, CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 24 Defendant. 25 26 27 28 -1- 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 5 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 6 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 7 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 8 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 9 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 10 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 11 under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that 12 will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 15 information or items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 20 well as their support staff). 21 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 22 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 24 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 25 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 26 responses to discovery in this matter. 27 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 28 -2- 1 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness in this 2 action. 3 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 4 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 5 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 6 entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 8 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 9 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 10 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 11 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 12 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 16 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 17 subcontractors. 18 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 19 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 21 Producing Party. 22 3. SCOPE 23 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 24 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 25 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 26 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 27 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 28 -3- 1 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 2 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 3 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public 4 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to 5 the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained 6 the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any 7 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 8 4. DURATION 9 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 10 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 11 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 12 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 13 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 14 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 15 applicable law. 16 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 17 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 18 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 19 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 20 The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, 21 items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, 22 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 23 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. The Parties agree that information pertaining to and 24 items containing absent putative class members/PAGA employees’ personally identifiable 25 information, putative class members/PAGA employees’ contact and financial information, 26 Defendant’s proprietary company policies and procedures, and materials relevant to Defendant’s 27 competitive advantage, are confidential and properly designated as Protected Material. 28 -4- 1 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. TireHub, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Jones v. TireHub, LLC (Jones v. TireHub, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)