Jones v. Tidrick

Supreme Court of Iowa

Jones v. Tidrick

3 Iowa 212

DecidedJune 15, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Iowa 212 (Jones v. Tidrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Tidrick, 3 Iowa 212 (iowa 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Stockton, J.

The receipts offered in evidence by defendant, if intended for no other purpose, may have been proper to lay the foundation for the defendant’s claim for damages, by reason of the alleged failure of plaintiff to finish the frame building in a workmanlike manner. As the bill of exceptions does not. pretend to set out the whole of the evidence in the cause, we cannot say that the receipts were not properly admitted by the court. ' And the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stockton, J.

The receipts offered in evidence by defendant, if intended for no other purpose, may have been proper to lay the foundation for the defendant’s claim for damages, by reason of the alleged failure of plaintiff to finish the frame building in a workmanlike manner. As the bill of exceptions does not. pretend to set out the whole of the evidence in the cause, we cannot say that the receipts were not properly admitted by the court. ' And the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Iowa 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-tidrick-iowa-1856.