Jones v. Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts

634 F. App'x 934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 2016

DocketNo. 15-7666

StatusPublished

This text of 634 F. App'x 934 (Jones v. Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts, 634 F. App'x 934 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing for improper venue his complaint seeking a temporary restraining order or permanent injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. The Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts, No. 2:15-cv-00388-RAJ-RJK [935]*935(E.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2015). We deny Jones’ motions for a temporary or permanent restraining order, injunctive relief, and damages and reimbursement. We also deny his motion to grant veteran’s emergencies. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing for improper venue his complaint seeking a temporary restraining order or permanent injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. The Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts, No. 2:15-cv-00388-RAJ-RJK [935]*935(E.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2015). We deny Jones’ motions for a temporary or permanent restraining order, injunctive relief, and damages and reimbursement. We also deny his motion to grant veteran’s emergencies. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 F. App'x 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-texas-beaumont-us-district-courts-ca4-2016.