Jones v. T. H.
425 U.S. 986, 96 S. Ct. 2195
Opinion
Appeal from D. C. Utah. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis granted. Without indicating any views on whether the District Court’s decision on the constitutional issue was sound, judgment affirmed insofar as it invalidated the challenged regulation of the Utah Division of Family Services as inconsistent with the Social Security Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. T. H., 425 U.S. 986, 96 S. Ct. 2195 (1976).
425 U.S. 986 (Jones v. T. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart v. Azar
313 F. Supp. 3d 237 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Stewart v. Hargan
District of Columbia, 2018
Planned Parenthood KS & Mid-MO v. Brownback
747 F.3d 814 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
Comacho v. Texas Workforce Commission
408 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Camacho v. Texas Workforce Commission
326 F. Supp. 2d 803 (W.D. Texas, 2004)
Planned Parenthood of Central Texas v. Sanchez
280 F. Supp. 2d 590 (W.D. Texas, 2003)
Alfonso v. Fernandez
195 A.D.2d 46 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Schweiker
559 F. Supp. 658 (District of Columbia, 1983)
Valley Family Planning v. North Dakota
661 F.2d 99 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
M. S. v. Wermers
557 F.2d 170 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)