Jones v. Sykes Enterprises Incorporated

District Court, D. South Carolina·Decided January 10, 2024·No. 3:21-cv-03396·Unknown

Opinion

"ity > br

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION VICTORIA LUNN JONES, § Plaintiff, § § vs. § CIVIL ACTION 3:21-cv-3396-MGL § SYKES ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED, — § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, □□□ AND DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Victoria Lunn Jones (Jones) filed this lawsuit against Sykes Enterprises Incorporated (Sykes). Jones is representing herself. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending to the Court Sykes’s motion for summary judgment be granted and this case be dismissed in its entirety. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on December 21, 2023, but Jones failed to file any objections. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315

(4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Sykes’s motion for summary judgment is granted and Jones’s case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 10th day of January, 2024, in Columbia, South Carolina. /s/ Mary Geiger Lewis MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ***** NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Jones is hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date

hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Sykes Enterprises Incorporated, (D.S.C. 2024).

Jones v. Sykes Enterprises Incorporated (Jones v. Sykes Enterprises Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related