Jones v. Strauss
842 S.W.2d 667, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 168, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 145, 1992 WL 324906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. Strauss. Read the opinion of the Court — 800 S.W.2d 842 →
Opinion
ORDER
The supplemental transcript submitted by the Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman is accepted as filed to demonstrate the trial court’s compliance with this court’s prior orders limiting the scope of the accounting proceeding. The trial court shall resolve any questions of fact and law and render a final judgment in the accounting proceeding, so that the parties may have the opportunity to appeal that separate judgment. Jones v. Strauss, 800 S.W.2d 842, 845 n. 1 (Tex.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Strauss, 842 S.W.2d 667, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 168, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 145, 1992 WL 324906 (Tex. 1992).
842 S.W.2d 667 (Jones v. Strauss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Strauss
800 S.W.2d 842 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)