Jones v. Strauss

Texas Supreme Court

Jones v. Strauss

842 S.W.2d 667, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 168, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 145, 1992 WL 324906

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 11, 1992

DocketNo. C-9877

StatusPublished

This text of 842 S.W.2d 667 (Jones v. Strauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Strauss, 842 S.W.2d 667, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 168, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 145, 1992 WL 324906 (Tex. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The supplemental transcript submitted by the Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman is accepted as filed to demonstrate the trial court’s compliance with this court’s prior orders limiting the scope of the accounting proceeding. The trial court shall resolve any questions of fact and law and render a final judgment in the accounting proceeding, so that the parties may have the opportunity to appeal that separate judgment. Jones v. Strauss, 800 S.W.2d 842, 845 n. 1 (Tex.1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The supplemental transcript submitted by the Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman is accepted as filed to demonstrate the trial court’s compliance with this court’s prior orders limiting the scope of the accounting proceeding. The trial court shall resolve any questions of fact and law and render a final judgment in the accounting proceeding, so that the parties may have the opportunity to appeal that separate judgment. Jones v. Strauss, 800 S.W.2d 842, 845 n. 1 (Tex.1990).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

842 S.W.2d 667, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 168, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 145, 1992 WL 324906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-strauss-tex-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack