Jones v. Stiefer
This text of 28 S.C.L. 15 (Jones v. Stiefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Curia, per
It can hardly be necessary to say, that it was not only incumbent on the plaintiff to prove a demand against the defendant, but to prove his right to sue upon it. What would have been the proper evidence of the clerk’s appointment, we shall not undertake to prescribe; it is too clear to require any discussion, that the evidence offered was wholly incompetent and insufficient. The proceedings of a court of record should be authenticated by something more than the certificate of the clerk, even if proved to be genuine, unless the contrary is provided by law. And no provision of ihe kind has been brought to our view in the bankrupt Act. Motion refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.C.L. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-stiefer-scctapp-1842.