Jones v. Stewart

46 F. App'x 478

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: September 17, 2002
• Docket: No. 01-17519; D.C. No. CY-00-01582-PGR
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Loyd Dale Jones, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.

Because Jones informed the district court that he pursued his grievances orally but not in writing and exhaustion of administrative remedies is mandatory, the district court properly dismissed his action. See Booth v. Chumer, 532 U.S. 731, 789-41, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).

Jones’ remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.