Jones v. State
This text of 365 S.W.2d 800 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Harrison County, upon his plea of guilty, for the offense of burglary, and his punishment was assessed at three years in the penitentiary.
The record contains no statement of facts or formal bills of exception.
Appellant, in his brief, complains that the trial court should have granted a new trial.
The facts relied upon are not shown in the record by formal or informal bill of exception.
Where the record does not contain the evidence nor any bills of exception, matters such as are set up in the motion for new trial cannot be intelligently reviewed. Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 159 S.W. 846.
There is no statement of facts on the motion for new trial.
No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 S.W.2d 800, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-texcrimapp-1963.