Jones v. State

113 S.W.2d 542, 133 Tex. Crim. 597, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 135

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Tex. Crim. 620 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 1938·No. No. 19384.·Published

Opinion

*598 MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is burglary ; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence adduced upon the trial is not brought forward for review.

The only complaint made of the procedure is that embraced in a bill of exception which, as qualified by the trial judge, reflects no error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*598 MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is burglary ; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence adduced upon the trial is not brought forward for review.

The only complaint made of the procedure is that embraced in a bill of exception which, as qualified by the trial judge, reflects no error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Jones v. State, 113 S.W.2d 542, 133 Tex. Crim. 597, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 135 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

113 S.W.2d 542 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.