Jones v. State
224 S.W. 888, 88 Tex. Crim. 30, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 332
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 1920·No. No. 5905.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The conviction is for theft, and punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for six months. The indictment appears regular. The absence of bill of exceptions or statement of facts precludes an inquiry into the sufficiency of the evidence or the manner of trial. In the absence of statement of facts or bills of exception, the presumption must be indulged that the evidence supports the verdict, and that the proceedings were regular.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 224 S.W. 888, 88 Tex. Crim. 30, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 332 (Tex. 1920).
224 S.W. 888 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mobley v. State
232 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)