Jones v. State
22 S.W. 149, 32 Tex. Crim. 110, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 226
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol, and prosecutes this appeal.
Motion in arrest of judgment was made upon the ground that the indictment failed to allege that it was presented in court. This defect is one of form only, and does not afford a ground for arresting the judgment. Niland v. The State, 19 Texas Cr. App., 166; Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 1951. This is the only question presented for our consideration. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 22 S.W. 149, 32 Tex. Crim. 110, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 226 (Tex. 1893).
22 S.W. 149 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stansbury v. State
82 S.W.2d 962 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
National Aid Life Ass'n v. Wiles
1935 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Bell v. Bearman
1913 OK 421 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
First National Bank v. Casey
138 N.W. 897 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
State v. Grubb
55 Kan. 678 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1895)