Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Jones v. State

1957 OK CR 9, 306 P.2d 357, 1957 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 9, 1957

DocketNo. A-12378

StatusPublished

This text of 1957 OK CR 9 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 1957 OK CR 9, 306 P.2d 357, 1957 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127 (Okla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

POWELL, Judge.

Chancie Jones, the appellant, was tried in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. He was tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury.

Defendant had first filed a motion to suppress the evidence, and after hearing, stipulated that the evidence heard thereon might be considered as the evidence in the case, and .the court overruled the motion to suppress and found the defendant guilty as charged, and assessed punishment at imprisonment in the county jail of Tulsa County for thirty days, and a fine of $50.

Although a brief was due to be filed in this court August 4, 1956, none has ever been filed, and no one appeared before this court on December 5, 1956, when the case was set for oral argument. We find no error in the record, and the uniform hold[358]*358ings of this court require affirmance. Fitzgerald v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 409, 142 P.2d 131; Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Wilson v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 421, 209 P.2d 512, 212 P.2d 144; Butler v. State, Okl.Cr., 269 P.2d 1001; Redding v. State, Okl.Cr., 301 P.2d 371.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWELL, Judge.

Chancie Jones, the appellant, was tried in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. He was tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury.

Defendant had first filed a motion to suppress the evidence, and after hearing, stipulated that the evidence heard thereon might be considered as the evidence in the case, and .the court overruled the motion to suppress and found the defendant guilty as charged, and assessed punishment at imprisonment in the county jail of Tulsa County for thirty days, and a fine of $50.

Although a brief was due to be filed in this court August 4, 1956, none has ever been filed, and no one appeared before this court on December 5, 1956, when the case was set for oral argument. We find no error in the record, and the uniform hold[358]*358ings of this court require affirmance. Fitzgerald v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 409, 142 P.2d 131; Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Wilson v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 421, 209 P.2d 512, 212 P.2d 144; Butler v. State, Okl.Cr., 269 P.2d 1001; Redding v. State, Okl.Cr., 301 P.2d 371.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1957 OK CR 9, 306 P.2d 357, 1957 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-oklacrimapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack