Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. State

116 S.E. 548, 30 Ga. App. 13, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 216

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 6, 1923

Docket14072

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 548 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 116 S.E. 548, 30 Ga. App. 13, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 216 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to return the verdict of guilty. The verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Len K. Roan, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to return the verdict of guilty. The verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Len K. Roan, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 548, 30 Ga. App. 13, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1923.