NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided: February 17, 2026
S26A0423. JONES v. THE STATE.
WARREN, Presiding Justice.
Appellant Willie Lee Jones was convicted of felony murder
based on aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the
commission of a felony in connection with the shooting death of
Benjamin Francis. 1 Jones’s sole claim on appeal is that the evidence
1 Francis was killed on May 10, 2023.In June 2024, a Gwinnett County grand jury indicted Jones for malice murder, two counts of felony murder (based on aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon), aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Michael Davis was also indicted for malice murder and other crimes related to Francis’s killing. Jones was tried alone from November 4 to 7, 2024. (The record does not indicate what happened to the charges against Davis; his case is not part of this appeal.) The jury found Jones not guilty of malice murder but guilty of the remaining charges. The trial court sentenced him to serve life in prison for felony murder based on aggravated assault and five consecutive years for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The remaining guilty verdicts were vacated or merged. See Dixon v. State, 302 Ga. 691, 697 (2017). Jones filed a timely motion for new trial, which he later amended. The trial court denied the motion on October 14, 2025. Jones filed a timely notice of appeal, and the case was docketed to the term of this Court beginning in December 2025 and presented at his trial was not sufficient as a matter of constitutional
due process to support those convictions.2 As discussed below, that
claim fails, so we affirm.
(a) In evaluating the constitutional sufficiency of the evidence,
we view all of the evidence presented at trial in the light most
favorable to the verdicts and consider whether any rational juror
could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of
the crimes of which he was convicted. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443
US 307, 319 (1979). “[I]t is the jury’s role to determine the credibility
of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies in the
evidence,” Williams v. State, 316 Ga. 147, 151 (2023) (quotation
marks omitted), meaning that “this Court does not reweigh the
evidence or resolve conflicting testimony,” Gobert v. State, 311 Ga.
305, 308 (2021) (quotation marks omitted).
submitted for a decision on the briefs.
2 Jones also contends that the evidence was not sufficient to support the
counts of felony murder based on possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. But Jones was not sentenced for those crimes, so his claims regarding them are moot. See, e.g., Ellington v. State, 314 Ga. 335, 340 (2022). 2 Viewed in this light, the evidence presented at Jones’s trial
showed the following. At 4:39 p.m. on May 10, 2023, Jones shot
Francis five times, killing him, on a sidewalk of Jimmy Carter
Boulevard in Norcross. Witnesses told responding investigators
that Jones, who was partially paralyzed and used a wheelchair,
went down the road just after the shooting, and investigators
apprehended him soon after. There was blood on his shirt, and he
said that “someone had cut him on the neck,” but investigators did
not see any such injury. Investigators found seven shell casings at
the scene of the shooting, a 9mm pistol in a nearby sewer drain, and
a utility knife on the ground near Francis.
Investigators later interviewed Jones; the interview was video-
recorded and played for the jury at trial. Jones told investigators
the following. Shortly before the shooting, he was at a convenience
store on Jimmy Carter Boulevard “minding [his] business,
panhandling,” when Francis, whom he had never seen before, “came
up around the corner, grabbed [him] by [his] neck,” “put a knife
behind [his] neck,” and said, “[G]ive me your money.” Francis then
3 threw Jones on the ground and “beat” him. Jones screamed for help,
and when Francis fled, Jones got back in his wheelchair and tried to
“chase him down.” Jones then heard gunshots, but he did not have
a gun and did not know who fired. He fled because the gunshots
“startled” him. When an investigator told Jones that there was
evidence showing that Jones shot Francis, Jones responded that
Francis “tried to kill [him].”
Investigators obtained surveillance videos from the
convenience store and other nearby businesses, which showed the
following. Around 4:30 p.m. on the day of the shooting, Francis
approached Jones, threw him to the ground, held his wheelchair on
top of him, and used a utility knife to try to cut a pouch that was
hanging around Jones’s neck. Francis walked away from Jones at
4:31 p.m. Jones then got back in his wheelchair, spoke to a woman
who witnessed the attack, and used her cell phone. At 4:37 p.m., a
man (who investigators later determined was Michael Davis)
arrived, spoke to Jones and the woman, and placed something on
Jones’s lap. Davis and the woman then walked down the sidewalk,
4 where Francis was standing, while Jones traveled through a parking
lot and approached Francis from the other side. It appears that
Jones and Francis argued for several seconds. At 4:39 p.m., Francis
began to walk away from Jones; Jones raised his arm, as if shooting
toward Francis; Francis ran toward Jones; and Francis fell on top of
Jones. Jones pushed Francis away and fled in his wheelchair, as
Davis and the woman ran away.
The medical examiner who performed Francis’s autopsy
concluded that he had been shot at least five times: once in the back,
once in the back of the thigh, once in the chest, and twice in the left
arm.3 The examiner determined that each shot was fired from at
least three feet away, and she collected from Francis’s body three
bullets and a bullet fragment. A firearms examiner concluded that
the bullets and bullet fragment, as well as the seven 9mm shell
casings found at the crime scene, were fired from the 9mm pistol
that was found in the sewer drain. In addition, Francis’s blood
3 On cross-examination, the medical examiner testified that at least one
of Francis’s injuries could have been consistent with him “bending over approaching” Jones. 5 tested positive for methamphetamine, which, the medical examiner
testified, “can make” a person “aggressive.”
Jones testified at trial that after Francis attacked him at the
convenience store and “cut [him] across the neck” and on his “face,”
Jones “approached” Francis and asked Francis why he “put[] his
hands on” Jones. They argued, and Francis said he was “fixing to
come back and kill [Jones].” Jones “fear[ed] for [his] life,” so he
“snatched a pistol from “Davis’[s] hip.” Francis, who still had a
knife, “turned back around and started running at [Jones],” and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided: February 17, 2026
S26A0423. JONES v. THE STATE.
WARREN, Presiding Justice.
Appellant Willie Lee Jones was convicted of felony murder
based on aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the
commission of a felony in connection with the shooting death of
Benjamin Francis. 1 Jones’s sole claim on appeal is that the evidence
1 Francis was killed on May 10, 2023.In June 2024, a Gwinnett County grand jury indicted Jones for malice murder, two counts of felony murder (based on aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon), aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Michael Davis was also indicted for malice murder and other crimes related to Francis’s killing. Jones was tried alone from November 4 to 7, 2024. (The record does not indicate what happened to the charges against Davis; his case is not part of this appeal.) The jury found Jones not guilty of malice murder but guilty of the remaining charges. The trial court sentenced him to serve life in prison for felony murder based on aggravated assault and five consecutive years for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The remaining guilty verdicts were vacated or merged. See Dixon v. State, 302 Ga. 691, 697 (2017). Jones filed a timely motion for new trial, which he later amended. The trial court denied the motion on October 14, 2025. Jones filed a timely notice of appeal, and the case was docketed to the term of this Court beginning in December 2025 and presented at his trial was not sufficient as a matter of constitutional
due process to support those convictions.2 As discussed below, that
claim fails, so we affirm.
(a) In evaluating the constitutional sufficiency of the evidence,
we view all of the evidence presented at trial in the light most
favorable to the verdicts and consider whether any rational juror
could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of
the crimes of which he was convicted. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443
US 307, 319 (1979). “[I]t is the jury’s role to determine the credibility
of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies in the
evidence,” Williams v. State, 316 Ga. 147, 151 (2023) (quotation
marks omitted), meaning that “this Court does not reweigh the
evidence or resolve conflicting testimony,” Gobert v. State, 311 Ga.
305, 308 (2021) (quotation marks omitted).
submitted for a decision on the briefs.
2 Jones also contends that the evidence was not sufficient to support the
counts of felony murder based on possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. But Jones was not sentenced for those crimes, so his claims regarding them are moot. See, e.g., Ellington v. State, 314 Ga. 335, 340 (2022). 2 Viewed in this light, the evidence presented at Jones’s trial
showed the following. At 4:39 p.m. on May 10, 2023, Jones shot
Francis five times, killing him, on a sidewalk of Jimmy Carter
Boulevard in Norcross. Witnesses told responding investigators
that Jones, who was partially paralyzed and used a wheelchair,
went down the road just after the shooting, and investigators
apprehended him soon after. There was blood on his shirt, and he
said that “someone had cut him on the neck,” but investigators did
not see any such injury. Investigators found seven shell casings at
the scene of the shooting, a 9mm pistol in a nearby sewer drain, and
a utility knife on the ground near Francis.
Investigators later interviewed Jones; the interview was video-
recorded and played for the jury at trial. Jones told investigators
the following. Shortly before the shooting, he was at a convenience
store on Jimmy Carter Boulevard “minding [his] business,
panhandling,” when Francis, whom he had never seen before, “came
up around the corner, grabbed [him] by [his] neck,” “put a knife
behind [his] neck,” and said, “[G]ive me your money.” Francis then
3 threw Jones on the ground and “beat” him. Jones screamed for help,
and when Francis fled, Jones got back in his wheelchair and tried to
“chase him down.” Jones then heard gunshots, but he did not have
a gun and did not know who fired. He fled because the gunshots
“startled” him. When an investigator told Jones that there was
evidence showing that Jones shot Francis, Jones responded that
Francis “tried to kill [him].”
Investigators obtained surveillance videos from the
convenience store and other nearby businesses, which showed the
following. Around 4:30 p.m. on the day of the shooting, Francis
approached Jones, threw him to the ground, held his wheelchair on
top of him, and used a utility knife to try to cut a pouch that was
hanging around Jones’s neck. Francis walked away from Jones at
4:31 p.m. Jones then got back in his wheelchair, spoke to a woman
who witnessed the attack, and used her cell phone. At 4:37 p.m., a
man (who investigators later determined was Michael Davis)
arrived, spoke to Jones and the woman, and placed something on
Jones’s lap. Davis and the woman then walked down the sidewalk,
4 where Francis was standing, while Jones traveled through a parking
lot and approached Francis from the other side. It appears that
Jones and Francis argued for several seconds. At 4:39 p.m., Francis
began to walk away from Jones; Jones raised his arm, as if shooting
toward Francis; Francis ran toward Jones; and Francis fell on top of
Jones. Jones pushed Francis away and fled in his wheelchair, as
Davis and the woman ran away.
The medical examiner who performed Francis’s autopsy
concluded that he had been shot at least five times: once in the back,
once in the back of the thigh, once in the chest, and twice in the left
arm.3 The examiner determined that each shot was fired from at
least three feet away, and she collected from Francis’s body three
bullets and a bullet fragment. A firearms examiner concluded that
the bullets and bullet fragment, as well as the seven 9mm shell
casings found at the crime scene, were fired from the 9mm pistol
that was found in the sewer drain. In addition, Francis’s blood
3 On cross-examination, the medical examiner testified that at least one
of Francis’s injuries could have been consistent with him “bending over approaching” Jones. 5 tested positive for methamphetamine, which, the medical examiner
testified, “can make” a person “aggressive.”
Jones testified at trial that after Francis attacked him at the
convenience store and “cut [him] across the neck” and on his “face,”
Jones “approached” Francis and asked Francis why he “put[] his
hands on” Jones. They argued, and Francis said he was “fixing to
come back and kill [Jones].” Jones “fear[ed] for [his] life,” so he
“snatched a pistol from “Davis’[s] hip.” Francis, who still had a
knife, “turned back around and started running at [Jones],” and
Jones shot. On cross-examination, Jones admitted that the attack
at the convenience store occurred several minutes before Jones shot;
that when Jones raised the pistol, Francis had his back to Jones and
was walking away; and that Francis came back toward Jones after
Jones began shooting.
(b) Jones contends that the evidence presented at trial was not
sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process because the State
failed to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt his claim of self-
defense. Specifically, Jones argues that he was justified in shooting
6 Francis because the evidence showed that Francis, while under the
influence of methamphetamine, had attacked Jones at the
convenience store and because Jones testified on direct examination
that when he later approached Francis, Francis threatened to kill
Jones and ran toward him with a utility knife. This claim fails.
The evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to conclude
that at the time of the shooting, Jones did not reasonably believe
that deadly force was necessary to defend himself because Francis
did not present an “imminent use of unlawful force” that could cause
“death or great bodily injury.” OCGA § 16-3-21(a) (providing, in
pertinent part, that a person is justified in using deadly force if he
“reasonably believes that such … force is necessary to defend
himself” against the “imminent use of unlawful force” and “to
prevent death or great bodily injury to himself”). In this respect, the
evidence allowed the jury to reasonably infer that after Francis’s
attack on Jones at the convenience store ended and Francis had
walked down the sidewalk, Jones called Davis, who soon arrived at
the store and gave Jones a pistol. Jones then traveled through a
7 nearby parking lot and approached Francis; they argued; and about
eight minutes after the convenience-store attack, Jones shot Francis
at least five times. He then fled the scene and initially lied to
investigators, claiming that he did not know who fired the shots.
And although Jones points to his testimony on direct examination
that Francis said he was “fixing to come back and kill [Jones]” and
“started running at [Jones]” before Jones shot, Jones admitted on
cross-examination that when he raised the pistol, Francis was
walking away and only came back toward Jones after Jones began
shooting. See Williams, 316 Ga. at 150 (“It is the role of the jury to
evaluate the evidence and, when doing so, the jury is free to reject
any evidence in support of a justification defense and to accept the
evidence that the shooting was not done in self-defense.” (cleaned
up)).
In sum, the jury was authorized to determine that Jones did
not reasonably believe that Francis posed any imminent threat of
harm to him when he shot, such that Jones killed Francis in
retaliation rather than in self-defense. Accordingly, the evidence
8 presented at trial was constitutionally sufficient to authorize a
rational jury to reject Jones’s claim of self-defense and to find him
guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of felony murder based on
aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the
commission of that felony. See OCGA § 16-3-21(a); Reddick v. State,
321 Ga. 73, 79 (2025) (concluding that the evidence, which allowed
the jury to infer that the defendant shot the victim while he was
retreating, was constitutionally sufficient to disprove the
defendant’s justification defense and to authorize the jury to find
him guilty of felony murder based on aggravated assault and
possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony); Williams,
316 Ga. at 150–51 (holding that the evidence, which included a video
recording showing that the victim was walking away from the
defendant when the defendant shot, authorized the jury to reject the
defendant’s claim of self-defense, and noting that even though there
was evidence that the victim had aimed a gun at the defendant while
they were inside an apartment, the jury could have concluded that
the defendant “did not reasonably believe that [the victim] posed any
9 imminent threat of harm to him when he shot” the victim later in a
parking lot); Gobert, 311 Ga. at 309 (determining that the evidence,
which showed that the victim, who was part of a group that had been
in a physical fight with the defendant’s step-daughter, was trying to
flee when the defendant shot him, was constitutionally sufficient for
the jury to reject the defendant’s justification defense and to find
him guilty of felony murder based on aggravated assault because he
and his step-daughter were not “in any danger or any imminent
threat of harm” at the time of the shooting).
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.