Jones v. State

105 S.E. 495, 150 Ga. 775, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 339
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1920·No. No. 2117·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. 'A prima facie ease is all that is necessary to carry dying declarations to the jury. It is an issue of fact whether or not they were made in the immediate prospect of death.’ Varnedoe v. State, 75 Ga. 181. It is not necessary that the person whose statements are sought to he introduced should express himself as believing that he is in a dying condition. Consciousness of his condition may be inferred from the nature of his wound, or from other circumstances. Young v. State, 114 Ga. 849 [40 S. E. 1000].” Andersen v. State, 122 Ga. 161 (50 S. E. 46) ; Jones v. State, 130 Ga. 274 (60 S. E. 840).

2. The evidence on the question of venue, though circumstantial, was sufficient. The verdict was supported by evidence. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. M. Austin, for plaintiff in error. B. A. Benny, attorney-general, G. E. Ilay, solicitor-general, and Graham Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 105 S.E. 495, 150 Ga. 775, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 339 (Ga. 1920).

105 S.E. 495 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
64 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Morakes v. State
40 S.E.2d 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Patterson v. State
199 Ga. 773 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Satterfield v. State
21 S.E.2d 861 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Etheridge v. State
199 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hill v. State
129 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Jordan v. State
129 S.E. 7 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Cooley v. State
110 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Johnson v. State
109 S.E. 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)