Jones v. State
This text of 74 S.E. 1001 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When the mother was testifying as a witness, on the cross-examination she was asked the result of the examination of the person of her daughter. The court said to her: “Tell those gentlemen [meaning the jury] all about it, no matter how unpleasant; just tell what her condition, was when you found it.” Exception is taken to this remark of the court. There is no direct statement in the record that the remark was addressed to the witness when she was apparently loath to discuss the subject-matter of the in[137]*137quiry; but the nature of the question, and the whole environment of the trial indirectly, though surely, indicate that the court’s remark was made at a time when the witness shrank from the ordeal of publicly stating facts of such delicacy, and so trying to virtuous modesty. We find nothing in the remark prejudicial to the accused. The court was simply admonishing the witness of her duty to answer a relevant question.
2. The testimony was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E. 1001, 138 Ga. 136, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-ga-1912.