Jones v. State

122 So. 3d 426, 2013 WL 5226545, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14803
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1070
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2013·No. No. 2D11-4920·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Michael L. Jones appeals his convictions and sentences, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. We affirm because when Jones entered his guilty plea, the denial of his motion to suppress was not mentioned at the change of plea hearing or noted in the plea agreement; thus, he did not “expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the lower tribunal, identifying with particularity the point of law being re[427]*427served.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114, 119 (Fla.2000); Bonfiglio v. State, 57 So.3d 990, 991 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); M.N. v. State, 16 So.3d 280, 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (en banc).

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 122 So. 3d 426, 2013 WL 5226545, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14803 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

122 So. 3d 426 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. State
760 So. 2d 114 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
M.N. v. State
16 So. 3d 280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bonfiglio v. State
57 So. 3d 990 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)