Jones v. State

923 So. 2d 1259, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4294, 2006 WL 756075
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 846 So. 2d 1224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 2006·No. No. 1D05-1237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(i). He properly asserts that the trial court erred in not appointing conflict-free counsel for the hearing on the motion. See Bullard v. State, 860 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motion to withdraw the plea is reversed, and the case is remanded for appointment of conflict-free counsel and for a new hearing on appellant’s motion.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 923 So. 2d 1259, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4294, 2006 WL 756075 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

923 So. 2d 1259 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bullard v. State
860 So. 2d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)