Jones v. State

873 So. 2d 546, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7063, 2004 WL 1123491
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 790 So. 2d 1194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2004·No. No. 2D03-1775·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Christopher Jones appeals convictions for sexual battery and aggravated battery. We affirm the convictions without discussion but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. As Jones argues, and the State concedes, the judgment reflects a conviction for sexual battery under section 794.011(3), Florida Statutes (2001), when Jones was actually convicted under section 794.011(4). On remand, the judgment must be corrected; Jones does not need to be present. We also affirm Jones’s designation as a sexual predator, see Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003); and we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Affirmed; remanded; conflict certified.

STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 873 So. 2d 546, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7063, 2004 WL 1123491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

873 So. 2d 546 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milks v. State
848 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)