Jones v. State
783 So. 2d 1222, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 2001 WL 467915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 633 →
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, however, the issues he raises would require an evidentiary proceeding before the trial court. As a result, this matter is not properly before us in a prohibition proceeding. Doyle v. State, 783 So.2d 295 (Fla.1st DCA 2001); McKinney v. Yawn, 625 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We therefore deny the petition, but without prejudice to petitioner’s right to raise the issues on direct appeal if he is convicted of the charges pending against him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 783 So. 2d 1222, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 2001 WL 467915 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
783 So. 2d 1222 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinney v. Yawn
625 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Doyle v. State
783 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)