Jones v. State

701 So. 2d 352, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 1997 WL 345857
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1997·No. No. 97-646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his postconviction motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was summarily denied. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant raised legally sufficient involuntary plea claims, see Dolan v. State, 618 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Eady v. State, 604 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Rackley v. State, 571 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and the order does not conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief. Although the trial court stated that the attached record refuted these allegations, it attached no portion of that record. We therefore reverse the order herein appealed, and remand either for entry of an order to which are attached those portions of the files and records conclusively showing no entitlement to relief, or for further proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 701 So. 2d 352, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 1997 WL 345857 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 352 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rackley v. State
571 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Eady v. State
604 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dolan v. State
618 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)