Jones v. State
679 So. 2d 59, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9254, 1996 WL 496970
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 633 So. 2d 482 →
Opinion
Affirmed, with the exception that the appeal is remanded so that the trial judge may determine the amount of jail time credit to which appellant is entitled in each of the two criminal cases in which he received concurrent sentences, and make the written sentences comport with the orally pronounced sentences by reflecting jail time credit. See Daniels v. State 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986); Stevens v. State, 651 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Smith v. State, 634 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 679 So. 2d 59, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9254, 1996 WL 496970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
679 So. 2d 59 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. State
651 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Daniels v. State
491 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Smith v. State
634 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)