Jones v. State

356 So. 2d 837, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 1978·No. No. GG-265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jones was convicted of unlawfully obtaining property by means of a worthless check he knew to be worthless, contrary to Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975). Jones’ sole point on appeal is that the trial court committed reversible error by denying his requested instruction that intent to defraud is an essential element of the crime proscribed by Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975).

This court’s recent decision in Adams v. State, 356 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), considered the identical issue, and held that intent to defraud is not an essential element of the offense proscribed by Section 832.05 (3). Therefore, the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 356 So. 2d 837, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

356 So. 2d 837 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
356 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)