Jones v. State

California Supreme Court

Jones v. State

19 Cal. 2d 874

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1942

DocketS. F. No. 16038

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cal. 2d 874 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 19 Cal. 2d 874 (Cal. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

CARTER, J. —

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action for damages sustained as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting plaintiffs’ property. The facts are substantially the same as those presented in several similar cases this day decided, the amount of the award in the instant case being $6,000. All material legal questions here presented have been determined in our decision filed this day in the case of Rose v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons set forth therein, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

[875]*875Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARTER, J. —

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action for damages sustained as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting plaintiffs’ property. The facts are substantially the same as those presented in several similar cases this day decided, the amount of the award in the instant case being $6,000. All material legal questions here presented have been determined in our decision filed this day in the case of Rose v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons set forth therein, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

[875]*875Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cal. 2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-cal-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack