Jones v. State

2014 Ark. App. 42
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 2014
DocketCR-13-443
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 42 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 42 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 42

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-13-443

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2014

JOE JONES APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [CR-2008-258] V. HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR., STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE

APPELLEE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge

This is a no-merit appeal from a probation revocation. Joe Jones pleaded guilty to

fleeing, a Class “D” felony, and was sentenced to sixty months’ probation. The State filed a

petition to revoke Jones’s probation alleging that, among other violations, he had failed to

pay his fines, costs, and fees as directed. The circuit court revoked his probation and

sentenced him to seventy-two months’ suspended imposition of sentence.

In compliance with Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and

Court of Appeals, Jones’s attorney brings a no-merit appeal and a motion asking to be

relieved as counsel. The motion to withdraw is accompanied by a brief, including both a

discussion of all matters in the record that might arguably support an appeal and a statement Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 42

as to why counsel considers the points to be incapable of supporting a meritorious appeal.

Jones has not exercised his right to file pro se points for reversal.

The State needs to show only one violation of probation in order to sustain a

revocation. Phillips v. State, 101 Ark. App. 190, 272 S.W.3d 123 (2008). Here, the

Crittenden County Sheriff’s Office Collector, Amy Peyton, testified that her office had not

received any payments from Jones. This was sufficient for the court to find that Jones

violated his probation by failing to pay all fines, costs, and probation fees. From our review

of the record and the brief presented to us, we find that counsel has complied with the

requirements of Rule 4-3(k)(1) and hold that there is no merit to this appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the revocation is affirmed.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

HARRISON and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bledsoe v. State
2014 Ark. App. 410 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-arkctapp-2014.