Jones v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Jones v. State

119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 646

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 1929

Docket2 Div. 420.

StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 923 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 646 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant was indicted. tried, and convicted of grand larceny. The offense charged was that he feloniously took and carried away a cow, the personal property of Arthur King. The court sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than five years, nor more than five years and one day. I-Ie appealed from the judgment of conviction rendered against him.

Pending the trial, there were innumerable objections interposed and exceptions reserved. While no brief has been filed in behalf of appellant, we have examined each ruling of the court complained of, and discover no error of a reversible nature. The points of decision involve questions of fact only. The jury found adversely to defendant on the facts, and, as no error appears, the judgment appealed from will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant was indicted. tried, and convicted of grand larceny. The offense charged was that he feloniously took and carried away a cow, the personal property of Arthur King. The court sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than five years, nor more than five years and one day. I-Ie appealed from the judgment of conviction rendered against him.

Pending the trial, there were innumerable objections interposed and exceptions reserved. While no brief has been filed in behalf of appellant, we have examined each ruling of the court complained of, and discover no error of a reversible nature. The points of decision involve questions of fact only. The jury found adversely to defendant on the facts, and, as no error appears, the judgment appealed from will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-alactapp-1929.