Jones v. State
110 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 660 →
Opinion
It would serve no good purpose to set out the evidence in this case. Suffice it to say we have carefully read the testimony as set out in the record, and find that the defendant should have been given the affirmative charge. Thomas v. State, 20 Ala. App. 640, 104 So. 687; Bush v. State, 20 Ala. App. 486, 103 So. 91; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 110 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
110 So. 922 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ammons v. State
101 So. 511 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Thomas v. State
104 So. 687 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Bush v. State
103 So. 91 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)