Jones v. State

597 So. 2d 1389, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 249, 1992 WL 92485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 So. 2d 569
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided April 17, 1992·No. CR-91-0609·Published

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Emmett Jones appeals from the dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus. The mat[1390]*1390ters raised in the habeas corpus petition were matters that should have been raised in a Rule 20 petition. See Rule 20.1, 20.4, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. The State has requested that this court reverse the judgment of the circuit court and remand this cause to the Circuit Court of Escambia County so that the appellant can have the opportunity to file a petition in the form prescribed by Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. The State’s motion is granted. The judgment is reversed and this cause remanded to the court of original conviction with directions that the appellant’s petition be returned to him so that he may have the opportunity to comply with the proper form of a Rule 20 petition as required by Rule 20.6(a). See also Graham v. State, 599 So.2d 82 (Ala.Crim.App.1992); Matkins v. State, 597 So.2d 760 (Ala.Crim.App.1992); Wright v. State, 597 So.2d 761 (Ala.Crim.App.1992).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 597 So. 2d 1389, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 249, 1992 WL 92485 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

597 So. 2d 1389 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
597 So. 2d 761 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Matkins v. State
597 So. 2d 760 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Graham v. State
599 So. 2d 82 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)