Jones v. Southgate Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jones v. Southgate Owners Corp.

289 A.D.2d 73, 733 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 73 (Jones v. Southgate Owners Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Southgate Owners Corp., 289 A.D.2d 73, 733 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered August 15, 2000, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint seeking, inter alia, damages for defendant’s allegedly wrongful imposition of sublet fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly found that, in light of the “broad language” in its Proprietary Lease, defendant cooperative corporation was entitled to impose and collect sublet fees without approval of a majority of the shareholders (see, Zuckerman v 33072 Owners Corp., 97 AD2d 736, 737; see also, McCabe v Hoffman, 138 AD2d 287). We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered August 15, 2000, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint seeking, inter alia, damages for defendant’s allegedly wrongful imposition of sublet fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly found that, in light of the “broad language” in its Proprietary Lease, defendant cooperative corporation was entitled to impose and collect sublet fees without approval of a majority of the shareholders (see, Zuckerman v 33072 Owners Corp., 97 AD2d 736, 737; see also, McCabe v Hoffman, 138 AD2d 287). We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 73, 733 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-southgate-owners-corp-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack