Jones v. South Carolina

57 F. App'x 589
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7710
StatusPublished

This text of 57 F. App'x 589 (Jones v. South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. South Carolina, 57 F. App'x 589 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

M. Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. South Carolina, No. CA-02-157-3-24 (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-south-carolina-ca4-2003.