Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General

467 F. App'x 235
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1000
StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 235 (Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General, 467 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jones seeks to appeal a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that his civil rights complaint be dismissed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Jones seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for seizure and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F. App'x 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-south-carolina-attorney-general-ca4-2012.