Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General

467 F. App'x 235
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1000·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jones seeks to appeal a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that his civil rights complaint be dismissed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Jones seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for seizure and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General, 467 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2012).

467 F. App'x 235 (Jones v. South Carolina Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)