Jones v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
ROGER JOHN DONALD JONES, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 24-441 JCH/JFR MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed January 3, 2025. Doc. 22. Objections were due by no later than January 17, 2025. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10 Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 22) is adopted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Reverse and/or Remand (Doc. 14) is DENIED and the Commissioner’s determination is AFFIRMED.
□□□ □□ oe rRICTUBGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Social Security Administration (Jones v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.