Jones v. Social Security Administration
This text of Jones v. Social Security Administration (Jones v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LEON JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1459 (JEB) ) ) SOCIAL SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter, brought under the Social Security Act, is before the Court on the Defendant
Commissioner’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance [Dkt. # 11]. On July 19, 2012, plaintiff
was advised to respond to the motion by August 31, 2012, and was warned that his failure to
respond could result in the Court’s treating the motion as conceded and summarily dismissing
the case. See Order (July 19, 2012). Plaintiff has not filed a response to defendant’s dispositive
motion and has not sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore will grant defendant’s
motion for judgment of affirmance as conceded and will dismiss the case. See Twelve John Does
v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on
the absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the District of Columbia
Circuit] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule.); accord Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d
1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004); FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 1997). A
separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
____________s/_______________ DATE: September 19, 2012 JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-social-security-administration-dcd-2012.