Jones v. Snodgrass
This text of 54 Mo. 597 (Jones v. Snodgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered, the opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs instituted a suit by attachment under the Landlord and Tenant Act, and the defendant filed in the cause a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement. The issues being made up and tried, on this plea they were found for the defendant and judgment was rendered thereon. From this j udgment the plaintiffs appealed.
Under our present statute, a judgment on a plea in abatement for the defendants, does not abate the suit, but it still continues as in an ordinary action, (1 Wagn. Stat., p. 189, § 42,) and proceedings by attachment under the Landlord and Tenant Act, are conducted in the same manner as provided by law, in cases of suits by attachment, (2 Wagn. Stat., p. 882, § 27,) as the cause still subsists in court and is not finally determined. It is plain, therefore, that an appeal will not lie from the judgment upon a plea in abatement. (Davis vs. Perry, 46 Mo., 449.)
The result is, that the appeal must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Mo. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-snodgrass-mo-1874.