Jones v. Snider
This text of 25 S.E. 668 (Jones v. Snider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The seller of personalty who reserved the title, could, after obtaining a judgment against the buyer for the ■price and collecting a portion, of the same, nevertheless, without canceling the judgment or paying or tendering back what had heen received, maintain against the buyer an action of bailtrover for the purpose of collecting the balance of the purchase-money, with interest thereon. Dykes v. McVay, 67 Ga. 502; Bowen v. Frick & Co., 75 Ga. 786.
2. The defendant could defeat (the action by tendering the balance due; or he could, by pleading and proving the facts as they existed, limit the plaintiff’s reoovery as above indicated. Morton r. Frick Co., 87 Ga. 230, 233. Judgment aflh'med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 S.E. 668, 99 Ga. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-snider-ga-1896.