Jones v. Shay

50 Cal. 508
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
DocketNo. 4862
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 50 Cal. 508 (Jones v. Shay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Shay, 50 Cal. 508 (Cal. 1875).

Opinion

By the Court:

The motion for nonsuit was properly denied. The plaintiff’s proof shows that at the time of the forcible entry complained of the plaintiff was in the actual and peaceable possession of the premises in controversy, not merely as the servant of another, but as a tenant at will; and had therefore such a possession as would enable him to maintain the action in his own name. If the proof did not warrant the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff, the defendant should either have moved for a new trial on that ground or have specified in his bill of exceptions in what particulars the evidence did not justify the decision in this respect, and have brought up the evidence on this point. But the defendant has done neither.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marquez-Luque v. Marquez
192 Cal. App. 3d 1513 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Daluiso v. Boone
455 P.2d 811 (California Supreme Court, 1969)
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Mixon
162 S.E.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
First & C Corp. v. Wencke
253 Cal. App. 2d 719 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Covina Manor, Inc. v. Hatch
284 P.2d 580 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Pacific Coast Joint Stock Land Bank v. Jones
92 P.2d 390 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
Carteri v. Roberts
73 P. 818 (California Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Cal. 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-shay-cal-1875.