Jones v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 7, 2018·No. 16-308·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-0308V Filed: September 8, 2017 UNPUBLISHED

ALAN L. JONES, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain- Barre Syndrome (GBS) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Jennifer L. Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 9, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 16, 2014. Petition at preamble. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 18, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. On September 7, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded a lump sum payment of $341,270.93, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($87,067.33), lost earnings ($67,554.68), pain and suffering ($172,260.31), and past unreimbursable expenses 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). ($14,388.61); $732.16 to satisfy two State of Florida Medicaid liens; and an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, as described in Proffer Section II.D. Proffer at 1-5. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id.

Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. 3 Accordingly, pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards:

A. A lump sum payment of $341,270.93, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($87,067.33), lost earnings ($67,554.68), pain and suffering ($172,260.31), and past unreimbursable expenses ($14,388.61), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alan L. Jones.

B. A lump sum payment of $717.36, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Florida Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and

Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Medicaid Casualty Recovery Program P.O. Box 12188 Tallahassee, FL 32317-2188 Case #: 640160

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State.

C. A lump sum payment of $14.80, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Florida Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and

The Rawlings Company ATTN: Kevin E. James J.D. Ref. No.: 76537760 P.O. Box 2000 LaGrange, KY 40031-2000

D. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in the Proffer Section II.D.

3 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Proffer at 3 n.2.

2 The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ALAN L. JONES,

Petitioner,

v. No. 16-308V Chief Special Master Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On March 9, 2016, Alan L. Jones (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation

(“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -

34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Respondent did not contest petitioner’s entitlement to

compensation in his Rule 4(c) Report, filed on August 18, 2017. On August 18, 2017, the Chief

Special Master found petitioner entitled to compensation.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLP, and petitioner

engaged Roberta Hurley, B.S., Ed., to provide an estimation of Alan L. Jones’s future vaccine-

injury related needs. All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by

the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for

Alan L. Jones, attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that Alan L. Jones should be

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart

attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Alan L. Jones has suffered past

loss of earnings and will suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers

that Alan L. Jones should be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for Alan L. Jones’s lost

earnings is $67,554.68. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Alan L. Jones should be awarded $172,260.31 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Alan L. Jones’s expenditure of past

unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Jones v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Jones v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a