Jones v. Seattle Talent Agency

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, CASE NO. C23-1289JLR 11 Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER v. 12 SEATTLE TALENT AGENCY, 13 Defendant. 14

15 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable 16 James L. Robart: 17 Before the court is a motion by pro se Plaintiff Cortez Daundre Jones styled as 18 objections to a denial of his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Obj. (Dkt. 19 # 4).) Mr. Jones’s IFP motion is currently pending before Magistrate Judge Michelle L. 20 Peterson and has not yet been denied. (See IFP Mot. (Dkt. # 1); see also Dkt.) 21 Regardless, if Magistrate Judge Peterson ultimately recommends that the court deny Mr. 22 Jones’s IFP application, he will not be entitled to object to such an order. See Minetti v. 1 Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the court STRIKES 2 Mr. Jones’s objections (Dkt. # 4).

3 Filed and entered this 30th day of August, 2023. 4 RAVI SUBRAMANIAN Clerk of Court 5 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah 6 Deputy Clerk

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22