Jones v. Scriven

8 Johns. 453
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defence in the former suit on the note, was not by way of set-off, but a direct objection to the consideration of the note ; and the very point in issue in this cause, namely, the value or worth of the art or skill sold, was tried and decided before. This very evidence was received by the jury, and the justice ought to have advised the jury that it was a bar, and the jury ought so to have found it. The judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Scriven, 8 Johns. 453 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

8 Johns. 453 (Jones v. Scriven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. Stewart
15 Barb. 67 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Wynn v. Hiday
2 Blackf. 123 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1828)
Shepherd v. Temple
3 N.H. 455 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1826)
Lonsdale v. Brown
15 F. Cas. 852 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1821)
Reed v. Prentiss
1 N.H. 174 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1818)