Jones v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedMarch 20, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-00222
StatusUnknown

This text of Jones v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc. (Jones v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc., (D.N.M. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO SHARON C. JONES, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:23-cv-00222-KK

SAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and FNU LNU, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER FOR NOTICE AND WAIVER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Sharon C. Jones' Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. 3, filed March 15, 2023 ("Application") Application to Proceed in forma pauperis The statute for proceedings in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), provides that the Court may authorize the commencement of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets the person possesses and that the person is unable to pay such fees. When a district court receives an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, it should examine the papers and determine if the requirements of [28 U.S.C.] § 1915(a) are satisfied. If they are, leave should be granted. Thereafter, if the court finds that the allegations of poverty are untrue or that the action is frivolous or malicious, it may dismiss the case[.]

Menefee v. Werholtz, 368 Fed.Appx. 879, 884 (10th Cir. 2010) (citing Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 60 (10th Cir. 1962). “[A]n application to proceed in forma pauperis should be evaluated in light of the applicant's present financial status.” Scherer v. Kansas, 263 Fed.Appx. 667, 669 (10th Cir. 2008) (citing Holmes v. Hardy, 852 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir.1988)). “The statute [allowing a litigant to proceed in forma pauperis] was intended for the benefit of those too poor to pay or give security for costs....” See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 344 (1948). While a litigant need not be “absolutely destitute,” “an affidavit is sufficient which states that one cannot because of his poverty pay or give security for the costs and still be able to provide himself and

dependents with the necessities of life.” Id. at 339. Plaintiff signed an affidavit stating she is unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and provided the following information: (i) Plaintiff’s monthly income during the past 12 months was $2,500.00 prior to the termination of her employment in February 2023; (ii) Plaintiff’s monthly expenses total $1,787.00; (iii) Plaintiff has $0.00 in cash and $100.00 in a bank accounts; and (iv) Plaintiff has two adult children who rely on her for support. The Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs of this proceeding because she signed an affidavit stating she is unable to pay the costs of these proceedings, and because she is unemployed. Notice and Waiver

Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 which provides that the “officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in [proceedings in forma pauperis]”). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Because Plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court orders the Clerk of the Court to notify Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center, at the address provided by Plaintiff in her Complaint, that an action has been commenced and request that Defendant waive service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). The Court cannot order the Clerk to notify the unidentified Defendant because Plaintiff has not provided a name or address. IT IS ORDERED that: (i) Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. 3, filed March 15, 2023, is GRANTED. (i1) The Clerk of the Court notify Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center that an action has been commenced and request that Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center waive service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). The notice shall include a copy of this Order, a waiver of service form, and a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint, Doc. 1, filed March 15, 2023. The Clerk shall mail the notice, waiver of service form, a copy of this Order and a copy of the Complaint to Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center at the following address: San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc. 801 W. Maple St. Farmington, NM 87402 If the docket shows that Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center did not return the waiver within 45 days after mailing of the notice, waiver form, and copy of the Amended Complaint, then Plaintiff shall file a motion requesting that officers of the Court serve a copy of the summons and Amended Complaint on Defendant San Juan Regional Medical Center.

Vatrtis. KIRTAN KHALSA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
335 U.S. 331 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Scherer v. State of Kansas
263 F. App'x 667 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
Menefee v. Werholtz
368 F. App'x 879 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-san-juan-regional-medical-center-inc-nmd-2023.