Jones v. Runge

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10

11 RONALD ANTHONY JONES, Case No. 21-00281 BLF (PR)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 13 v . AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 KYLE RUNGE, et al., 15 Defendants. (Docket No. 11) 16

17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983 against prison staff at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1.1 On May 11, 2021, the 20 Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff was directed to 21 file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed. Id. 22 Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint 23 due to the law library being closed. Dkt. No. 11. Good cause appearing, the motion is 24 GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint using the court’s form complaint to 25 attempt to correct the deficiencies in the original complaint no later than July 30, 2021. 26 27 1 The amended complaint must include the caption and civil case number used in this 2 order, i.e., Case No. C 21-00281 BLF (PR), and the words “AMENDED COMPLAINT” 3 on the first page. Plaintiff must answer all the questions on the form in order for the action 4 to proceed. Plaintiff is reminded that the amended complaint supersedes the original, and 5 Plaintiff may not make references to the original complaint. Claims not included in the 6 amended complaint are no longer claims and defendants not named in an amended 7 complaint are no longer defendants. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th 8 Cir.1992). 9 Failure to respond in accordance with this order by filing an amended 10 complaint in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without 11 prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. 3s 12 IT ISSO ORDERED. E 13 || Dated: June 14, 2021 beds aoe) 14 BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Oo Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Order Granting Mot. for EOT to File Am. Compl. PRO-SE\BLF\CR.21\00281Jones_eot-ac