Jones v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jones v. Rosa

201 A.D.2d 563, 609 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1206

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 563 (Jones v. Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Rosa, 201 A.D.2d 563, 609 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human [564]*564Rights, dated March 18, 1991, which, after a hearing, dismissed the complaint.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to respondent Crowe’s Funeral Homes, Inc.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence in the record (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181; New York State Div. of Human Rights v Johnson & Higgins, 140 AD2d 214; Executive Law § 298) to support the Commissioner’s determination that the respondent had a valid business reason for discharging the petitioner from employment (see, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792; Mayer v Manton Cork Corp., 126 AD2d 526). Mengano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human [564]*564Rights, dated March 18, 1991, which, after a hearing, dismissed the complaint.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to respondent Crowe’s Funeral Homes, Inc.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence in the record (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181; New York State Div. of Human Rights v Johnson & Higgins, 140 AD2d 214; Executive Law § 298) to support the Commissioner’s determination that the respondent had a valid business reason for discharging the petitioner from employment (see, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792; Mayer v Manton Cork Corp., 126 AD2d 526). Mengano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 563, 609 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-rosa-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack